Murphy also argues that MMT “has a clear interest in restraining inflation” and this means “taxing sufficient government created money out of existence in a period to secure this goal.”. By using this site, you agree that we can set and use these cookies. None of this is to say that economics is useless or rubbish, just that it is looking at things in the wrong way. Economics is generally regarded as a social science, which revolves around the relationships between individuals and societies. For further discussion, please see Discounting Revisions Housing Starts Were Flat Mish 'Saving' Social Security and Medicare sounds like a good idea, but they can't be saved in their current form because politicians are hooked on lying about what it will take. In sum, “economic nationalism” equals economic nonsense. It’s not much help to tell a chancellor trying to write a Budget—setting out her tax and The differential expressed as a percentage of GDP might well be close to the desired inflation rate.”. I’m not talking about predicting the future. A perfectly good argument against this vote is based in history and tradition. For the last 30 years at least, the conventional approach to macroeconomic management has been to use interest rates, not fiscal policy, to control demand and inflation. Instead, the smart set says things like this: I’m against Scottish independence because I’m horrified at the prospect of our country being dismantled. That’s what sane people should expect. Here influential supporters close to the Labour leadership include Paul Mason and Chris Williamson MP; in the US, one of its leading theorists is Stephanie Kelton, who was an economic advisor to Bernie Sanders. The Scots will decide if they will to remain a part of Great Britain or become independent. If they now think it is better to go it alone, that’s for them to decide. MMT is no longer limited to books and journals. It looks like you are a Prospect subscriber. Economics is a failed science. It was easy enough to point to the empirical evidence that showed that many of the justifications for austerity were simply wrong. The problem is that the cultural, historic and commercial ties that bind us are too tight to safely be cut. This sounds almost too obvious for John Rentoul’s famous list of “Questions To Which The Answer Is No.” But for some proponents of “Modern Monetary Theory” (MMT), Labour’s adoption of a “fiscal credibility rule” (based in part on academic work by Simon Wren-Lewis and me), means that “Labour is committed to the thinking which will deliver more austerity.”. And this is the crucial point—if it tried to buy them and printed money to do so the result would mostly be inflation, with more money chasing a restricted supply of doctors and Click to learn more about these interests and how we use your data. The witch doctor thinks he is tapping into some universal truth that transcend time and place. I’d also argue that an independent Scotland is an economic nonsense. To be fair, the credible proponents of MMT recognise this. by Peter May on 31st January 2019. Economics takes the same view. Richard argues that what it means is “that there is no requirement per se to balance the government’s books”—and that fiscal rules of the sort Labour proposes which, even if they don’t target balanced budgets, impose any constraint on the deficit are therefore damaging and unnecessary. The West is slipping into paganism and the economics profession is supplying the shamans. And that in turn means you can have budget surpluses and excess demand at the same time, just as you can have budget deficits and deficient demand. Does MMT then argue that governments can simply spend whatever they like? ', enter your email address and press 'Submit'. spending plans—that reversing the order would magically solve all their problems. The reason is no one ever gets the right answer. The Scottish commercial banks, with their vast liabilities, and still unresolved off-balance-sheet losses, will always physically reside in Britain. It's being used to support policy proposals and is both lauded and attacked in the popular press. Editor: Tom ClarkManaging Editor (Arts & Books): Sameer RahimSenior Editor: Alex DeanHead of Digital: Chris Tilbury Production Editor: David McAllisterCreative Director: Mike Turner Assistant Editor: Rebecca LiuEditorial Assistant: Emily LawfordUS Writer-at-Large: Sam Tanenhaus, Editorial enquiries: 020 7255 1344Subscription enquiries: 0330 333 0173, Commercial Director: Alex StevensonHead of Marketing: Paul MortimerMarketing and Circulation Executive: Susan Acan Head of Advertising Sales: Adam Kinlan 020 3372 2934Head of Finance and Resources: David de Lange. Plus: Philip Collins on who's to blame for Boris Johnson, and the latest on the search for a vaccine. The reason you can’t rigidly separate positive from normative economics is that you can’t rigidly separate claims of fact from claims of value in general. Photo: Yui Mok/PA Wire/PA Images, Is John McDonnell a neoliberal? nonsense economics April 18, ... that they’ve been teaching their students a lot of nonsense for thirty years. Most English people are pretty neutral about Scotland. Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. Patriotism, tradition, nostalgia and mere taste are probably the primary motivations for the voters. And education, and welfare system, and so on. You will be able to object to this processing on the next page and in all our communications. Generally, economists are better at solving & explaining acute economic problems than predicting or preventing them. Wine Economist – making sense of nonsense in the wine world. Presidential Nonsense on Economics. cyclical movements in the economy. EMAIL. The guy just wants a new truck. Economics - "/lit/ - Literature" is 4chan's board for the discussion of books, authors, and literature. Follow Progressive Pulse. The actions and beliefs of the private sector matter as well. Current mainstream economics as taught in the most universities is “neoclassical”. Worse yet, we are slipping into a tyranny of shamans. England gets lot of them… Read more ». The output gap is an economic measure of the difference between the actual output of an economy and its potential output. But again it’s necessary to unpack this. What does it mean to say that “there can only be spend and tax” rather than “tax and spend”? He will know why. Post-Covid, are taxes hikes essential to fund the future? Everyone in the West is petrified to stand up and say they want what they want because they want it. But the idea it can do so without raising taxes is for the birds. Discussion over.”. The field of economics is extremely important to us all, which is why realism is needed all the more. And no matter what the Bank of England did, long-term interest rates would rise, as the private sector—not just “markets” or Goldman Sachs, but ordinary businesses and households—observed that we were not just spending more than we were taxing, but that we were consuming, or trying to consume, more than we were producing, and that inflation was the inevitable consequence. It is up to the Scots to decide if they wish to be ‘independent’ (though the sensible money is that they will aim for being in the EU as soon as possible, not least because Brussels provides a safe haven for failed or worn out politicians to go on being paid vast salaries) and they will no doubt cast votes inspired by emotional subjects such as Mel Gibson waving a sword. Murphy says: “Experience in recent years has suggested that total tax revenues should be less than total government spending or additional money supplies required to ensure the liquidity to permit growth is not present in the economy. PLUS receive a free e-book and 7 articles of your choosing on the Prospect website. Money is ultimately a creation of government—but that doesn’t mean only government deficits determine the level of demand at any one time. China has been clamping down aggressively. It's not just the Phillips Curve which is nonsensical. Sure, the UK could run very large budget deficits, even with unemployment low. Every human action has some perfect model in the stars that only the economist can see. The problem is obvious. This site uses cookies to improve the user experience. If this means anything coherent at all—there seems to be a misplaced “not,” but even so the logic or economics here baffles me—the implication is that the government’s debt should over time grow broadly in line with nominal GDP, with ups and downs reflecting You can create money out of nothing, but you can’t create doctors, schools, or consumer goods. So in the end I, like many others who opposed both the dishonest rhetoric and the unnecessary economic damage of post 2010 “austerity,” find the arguments of MMT proponents frustrating. Here’s a good example of how this weird religion has spread like kudzu across the West. the logic is the same. But it’s the second point that matters. The pandemic has landed treasuries everywhere with whacking great overdrafts—in the UK... Jonathan Portes is Professor of Economics, King's College London and Senior Fellow, UK in a Changing Europe. For more details on the cookies we use and how to manage them, see our, Theresa May’s latest Brexit "red line" is as foolish as the rest, The OECD’s economic survey was vital—but not for the reasons you’d think. So he probably knows his economic argument is nonsense. The future is not written, at least we don’t think so, which means conditions can change between the time you make a prediction and the point in the future being predicted. Unfortunately. Politicians who say that “we risk going the way of Greece” or “there is no money left” are scaremongering: a point made very forcefully by both Wren-Lewis and myself back in 2011. Why do so many teenage girls want to change gender? Most people have not noticed it, but the official capitulation/sellout of science happened on Sep 3, 2020.#1 The UK’s most prominent proponent, Richard Murphy, sets it out here. Remember that the UK’s budget was in surplus in 1987, at a time when the economy was in an unsustainable boom. Thank you for your support of Prospect and we hope that you enjoy everything the site has to offer. Why Do Democrats Hate Donald Trump So Much? That said, behavior economics is a minor field and much of the work being done has not significantly reorientated in the field. But one thing is absolutely certain. Your password will then be emailed to you. I’m fond of saying that economics is closer to tarot card reading than physics on the empiricism scale. To the sane person, it is obvious that the people of a nation hold the exclusive right to determine who can and who cannot enter. At least the old priesthoods knew their limits. by Jonathan Portes / January 30, 2019 / Leave a comment. Democratic rising star Alexandria Register today and access any 7 articles on the Prospect website FREE in the next 30 days. Nonsense economics: the rise of modern monetary theory. Since it’s government deficits that ultimately create money, without a deficit demand will inevitably be below what’s needed. Wren-Lewis and I argued strongly at the time that deficit reduction should have been slowed, not accelerated. So, while most economics is just organised common sense the difficult part of economics is the working out of how common, how sensible and … The jab … So in the end MMT, having begun by arguing that a conventional fiscal rule is a neoliberal plot to entrench austerity, seems to end up in much the same place. it is a mixture of the tautological and the tendentious. This may well make sense when interest rates are at or close to zero. Yes, the UK can afford a high quality NHS. Democrats believe — or lie to their constituents about — that the economy is a “100-penny dollar,” meaning the more of those pennies “selfishly” hoarded by “billionaires,” the fewer pennies left to pay “working Americans” a “living wage” — instead of focusing on creating more dollars. It is not quite superstition, but the guy with the bone in his nose is within hailing distance of the town’s economist. "Men are trash": the surprisingly philosophical story behind an internet punchline, How 2000s boarding school drama Wild Child became a hidden cult hit, The endgame for Johnson could come sooner than you think, Face it, one-nation Tories: the party’s over, What Labour's antisemitism crisis tells us about Britain, Trump's contempt for how government works has rarely been so stark, Homes for all: what new social and affordable housing can do for Britain, Register now to attend the 2020 Think Tank Awards ceremony, Watch: The Big Pivot—the third sector post Covid-19, Tips for winning the Bennett Prospect Prize, Reforming fundraising will be vital for charities’ survival, Only a locally-led planning system can fix the housing crisis, The importance of staying connected: how video games can help tackle loneliness, More people than ever now rely on a steady, fast internet connection. Facebook. From what I’ve read, they will not actually be independent as London will continue to rule their foreign policy. At the sociological level it would mean giving up the trappings of power and pay that go with their current intellectual monopoly because the paymasters of … And the same applies to the UK. Crucially, Scotland’s still extremely precarious financial services industry is viewed as UK-backed — and that means the Bank of England. The Conservative belief that there is some law of nature which prevents men from being employed, that it is “rash” to employ men, and that it is financially ‘sound’ to maintain a tenth of the population in idleness for an indefinite period, is crazily improbable – the sort of thing which no man could believe who had not had his head fuddled with nonsense for years and years … As Richard puts it: “A government with a balanced budget necessarily denies an economy the funds it needs to function.”. The Bank of England. The claim that that MMT means that a future government can dodge hard choices about how to pay for decent public services is just plain nonsense. Equally, it also means that MMT—at least the credible version—does not mean there is no limit to deficits, just a different one, dictated by the potential impact on inflation. For example, in 2011-12, when inflation rose sharply, even as the economy remained weak. Despite this, economists act as if they possess the ability to accurately forecast the future. But as far as the rest of the world is concerned, we’re one entity — a reality that’s prevailed for centuries, long before the 2012 Olympics. Economics, I’m talking macroeconomics, deals is loads of complexity. Practice Questions 2010. They can be symbolically severed, yes, with the creation of yet another expensive layer of Scottish government, with all the special advisers, civil servants and juicy public sector per diems that would bring to Edinburgh’s already cosseted political elite. by Laurence M. Vance; by Walter E. Williams January 18, 2012. In fact, more women are working in the US today than men. It is not just a pithy put-down. Any passing opportunist must be free to set up camp because the economist believes it will please the gods of efficiency. June 9, 2020. I wish, as an Englishman, to throw my small weight into the Britain or Scotland debate. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications. Please understand I’ve been asking in the most genuine way for someone to explain what is wrong about what I’m saying and what I’m missing. But MMT goes farther than this. This is the text, including slides, from a talk given on October 28 2020 during an online event organised by University College Cork’s Economics and Environmental Societies. Cultural pride is so taboo we have otherwise reasonable people claiming the maths are on their side in the same way Druids thought the gods were on their side. It simply isn’t rich enough—it doesn’t have the doctors, nurses, or hospitals it would need. But MMT is in many respects not wrong: instead, it is a mixture of the tautological, the obvious and the tendentious. And economic policy aside, it might be good marital policy to let him have one. It’s certainly entirely consistent with what Wren-Lewis and I have written. Economics is the one area of practical mathematics where getting the wrong answer is of no consequence. The economy of the United States is the daily economic activity of 300 million people, plus every country with whom we conduct business. Few contributors in the field of economics have done more to educate the masses about the intellectual failures of Karl Marx than Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk. But this is about as orthodox a policy prescription as you can get. Cutting UK overseas aid in the name of Covid fiscal prudence is pure nonsense Larry Elliott In economic terms Rishi Sunak’s saving of up to £4bn is … Here’s where the proponents of MMT end up tying themselves in knots. So how, ask Jill Rutter and Anand Menon, did we come to the brink of a hard departure? So what is MMT—and what would it actually mean in policy terms for the UK? Economics is modern shamanism. Critics argue that economics is not a science due to a lack … The first point—that (fiat) money is ultimately a governmental construct in modern capitalist economies, and central banks can indeed produce as much of it as they want—is not news…. But this isn’t true as a matter of economics, theoretical or empirical. To an economist, not such right exists. Bangladesh is a sovereign nation just as much as the UK is (meaning, in this context, that it has its own currency managed by a central bank that is under the ultimate control of the government). “First it says governments can make money out of thin air, at will… MMT then says all government spending is in fact funded by money created in this way, created by central banks on the government’s behalf… MMT logically argues as a consequence that there is no such thing as tax and spend when considering the activity of the government in the economy; there can only be spend and tax.”. Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information. Both from an economic perspective and from a common sense one, taxing and (government) spending happen at the same time. MMT is increasingly popular among left-wing economists. And what does this mean in practice? The biggest economic nonsense of all is a promise to pay people later, if they will pay their taxes today, when basic arithmetic says we will not be able to do so. The millions of variables in play makes forecasting problematic. I’m not saying a country of 5m people, with a wealth of know-how, couldn’t survive. If what MMT is saying is that budget deficits don’t matter because a sovereign government that prints its own currency (like the US, UK, or Turkey, but unlike eurozone countries) can, in principle, never be forced against its will to default, this is broadly correct. Pretending economics can ever, under any circumstance, in any fashion, be treated as an empirical science, is nonsensical from the get go. The problem with this is that it is either obvious or misleading. The fact that none of them would let you borrow their pencil much less pitch a tent in their yard is dismissed as irrelevant. Spread ideas for a progressive world. China has come down very hard trying to contain this outbreak. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Whatsapp Parler Email Print. Scotland has been in Great Britain since 1707 and done pretty well as a consequence. MMT—unless you reintroduce some more orthodox thinking via the backdoor—would tell you the opposite. The magazine is owned and supported by the Resolution Group, as part of its not-for-profit, public interest activities. Germany has been running surpluses for years. Economics is a social science that studies human behaviour not abstract atoms.